Jump to content

Talk:Michel Foucault

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleMichel Foucault is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 7, 2005.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 7, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 17, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
November 19, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
June 12, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 25, 2017, and June 25, 2020.
Current status: Former featured article

Pronunciation of name Comment

[edit]

How is Foucault's name pronounced? Normal French pronunciation would be /miˈʃɛl fuˈko/ but I have seen web sites that say it's /ˈfuko/. Did he alter the proonunciation when he lived in Scandinavia and Germany, or are those sites simply wrong?— Preceding unsigned comment added by ABehrens (talkcontribs) 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Genealogy as historical method

[edit]

The section headed "Genealogy as historical method" makes no reference to genealogy as historical method.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 August 2024

[edit]

It does not appear to be true or correct that Michel Foucault signed the January 1977 French petition calling for abolishing the age of consent; his omission to do so is notable given that so many others did. This is actually stated in the "French petitions against age of consent laws" article, and is backed up in 2 of the sources cited, 5 and 6:

https://journals.openedition.org/gss/3134 > Parmi lesquels ne figure pas Michel Foucault

https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/2020/01/02/matzneff-les-signataires-d-une-petition-pro-pedophilie-de-1977-ont-ils-emis-des-regrets_1771174/ > Nous avons essuyé de rares refus (pour ma part, je me souviens du refus de signer de Marguerite Duras, d'Hélène Cixous, de Xavière Gauthier, de Michel Foucault)

Foucault signed the May 1977 letter arguing against the disparity in age of consent laws between heterosexuals and homosexuals.

It seems remarkable to include this false factoid in the page for Foucault when the same petition is not mentioned on the Wikipedia pages of many who did actually sign it. Borwse (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done by ZionniThePeruser: Special:Diff/1240848929. Skynxnex (talk) 20:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Sorman accuses Michel Foucault of abusing boys in Tunisia

[edit]

There have been serious allegations against Michel Foucault regarding sexual abuse of boys in Tunisia during the late 1960s. These claims were brought to light by French-American professor Guy Sorman, who stated that he witnessed Foucault engaging in inappropriate behavior with young boys. These allegations have sparked significant controversy and debate, but they remain allegations and have not been legally proven.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/france-s-reverence-for-intellectuals-shielded-michel-foucault-from-scandal/

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/4/16/reckoning-with-foucaults-sexual-abuse-of-boys-in-tunisia

https://www.dailysabah.com/arts/guy-sorman-accuses-michel-foucault-of-abusing-boys-in-tunisia/news 2401:D002:E10E:3D00:8933:C51B:9C8B:B77A (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorman himself has largely walked back his claims: https://www.lexpress.fr/idees-et-debats/michel-foucault-et-la-pedophilie-enquete-sur-un-emballement-mediatique_2148517.html
Stating that he never actually witnessed any misconduct on Foucault's part (asides from "throwing money at young boys" of which he states he is unsure of the reason), that he originally heard of these events from a "Mohammed", that he is unsure of the ages of the "boys" he saw Foucault "buy" (ie. throw money at), and that he met with Foucault in 1970 in Tunisia instead of 1969, Foucault having left Tunisia in 1968. I believe allegations made against those in power should always be considered and believed, however, given both Sorman's inconsistencies and his generally reactionary politics - I think it is safe to take his allegations with a grain of salt. LonelyLegumes (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why these claims should not be included with the article along side these counter explainations given that it's still a commonly talked about subject with foucault. flat earth and the elders of Zion aren't true but they still have their own articles because they are notable subjects. AssanEcho (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]